Climate Dialogue about the sun

Over at Climate Dialogue we are starting a new discussion about the influence of the sun on the climate. People familiar with climate discussions know that the sun has been and still is a popular argument against the large role for greenhouse gases. This has to do with solar proxies correlating well with climate proxies (in the distant past). Also the Little Ice Age coincided with the Maunder Minimum, a period with few visible sunspots. So if the sun played a role in the past, why shouldn’t it in the present?

But figuring out how the sun has varied in e.g. the past millennium isn’t easy. And in fact, the science seems to be developing in the other direction, i.e. showing an even smaller solar influence than scientists thought let’s say a decade ago. AR5 said that in terms of radiative forcing since 1750 the influence of the sun is almost negligible.

Meanwhile solar activity has dropped to levels last seen a century ago. Some scientists suggest the sun might go into a new Maunder Minimum in the coming decades. What influence will that have on our climate?

So the timing of this dialogue is apt. We have a record number of participants, namely five. Two of them – Nicola Scafetta (USA) and Jan-Erik Solheim (NOR) – believe in a large role of the sun. Mike Lockwood (GBR) – in line with AR5 – thinks the sun is only a minor player. The two other participants – Ilya Usoskin (FIN) and José Vaquero (ESP) – seem somewhere in between.

In our Introduction we asked the participants the following questions:

1) What is according to you the “best” solar reconstruction since 1600 (or even 1000) in terms of Total Solar Irradiance?

2) Was there a Grand Solar Maximum in the 20th century?

3) What is your preferred temperature reconstruction for the same period? How much colder was the Little Ice Age than the current warm period?

4) What is the evidence for a correlation between global temperature and solar activity?

5) How much of the warming since pre-industrial would you attribute to the sun?

6) Is the Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) of the sun all that matters for the Earth’s climate? If not, what amplification processes are important and what is the evidence these play a role?

7) what is the sun likely going to do in the next few decades and what influence will it have on the climate? Is there consensus on the predictability of solar variability?

There will be a lot of area to cover. Please head over to the dialogue and feel free to leave a public comment. Keep in mind that the goal of Climate Dialogues is to find out on what participants agree, on what they disagree and why they disagree.

 

Door |2014-10-15T17:02:02+00:0015 oktober 2014|Climate Dialogue|6 Reacties

6
Reageer op dit artikel

avatar
6 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
5 Comment authors
Kimbal BinderMarcel CrokHans ErrenAndre BijkerkRob v Recent comment authors

Deze website gebruikt Akismet om spam te verminderen. Bekijk hoe je reactie-gegevens worden verwerkt.

  Subscribe  
nieuwste oudste meest gestemd
Abonneren op
Rob v
Gast
Rob v

So how exactly works that plasma ball we call Sun ?

http://youtu.be/kin9zqPMPaI

Andre Bijkerk
Gast
Andre Bijkerk

Marcel, Er is weinig twijfel dat de zon iets te maken heeft met de temperatuur op Aarde maar de vraag is of het de klimaatdiscussie dient.

Als je één en ander reduceert tot de pure ‘basic’ wetenschappelijke methode’ dan rijst de vraag of een zekere hypothese (broeikas..etc) kan worden gefalsificeerd door een andere hypothese, (it’s the sun, stupid). Men moet zich goed realiseren dat een tegenhypothese automatisch een kwetsbaarheid introduceert. namelijk de ‘fallacy’ dat falcificatie daarvan tot ‘bewijs’ van de orginele hypothese gaat dienen: “Het is dus uiteindelijk toch niet de zon, dus moet het wel het broeikasgas effect zijn”.

Hans Erren
Gast

Marcel heb je Bas van Geel om een bijdrage gevraagd?

Kimbal Binder
Gast

“According to the latest IPCC report, AR5, the influence of the sun on our climate since pre-industrial times, in terms of radiative forcing, is very small compared to the effect of greenhouse gases.” What?!!! The Sun is the primary source of power to our planet and with CO2 being around one half of one per cent of the atmosphere, it has little power to do anything. But more is better! That is why greenhouses push out air to the plants at 400-600% of normal CO2 so plants will grow faster and bigger. Studying the evidence of past climate via ice… Lees verder »